ManufacturingEUPeriod covered: 2025

An SME sustainability data pack should answer real business questions

Smaller businesses are increasingly asked for sustainability data. A single reusable pack, with clear owners and an estimation log, replaces the spreadsheet-per-request treadmill.

Worker recording information on a clipboard beside industrial equipment
Byline
Gambit Reign analysis
Period covered
2025
Reviewed
6 October 2026
Topic
Sustainability reporting
Reading time
3 min read

Key takeaways

  • The 2025 Commission Recommendation established a voluntary reporting standard for SMEs. It is a recommendation, not a universal legal obligation.
  • A data pack built once — with named owners, evidence references, review dates and an estimation log — answers most requests without rebuilding the answer each time.
  • The reporting landscape changed materially in 2026. Thresholds and scope stated in earlier guidance should not be relied on as current.

The request pattern SMEs actually face

A smaller manufacturer rarely faces a single, well-defined reporting obligation. It faces a stream of requests: a large customer's supplier questionnaire, a tender requirement, a bank's information request, a request from a customer's own auditor. Each asks for overlapping information in a slightly different format.

The default response is to answer each request as it arrives, with whatever data is to hand. This produces three problems. The answers are inconsistent between requests. The effort is repeated. And the underlying data is rarely examined, so an estimate produced under time pressure becomes a number that gets repeated.

The alternative is a data pack: a single internal resource that holds the information in a defined structure, from which individual requests can be answered. It is not a report and it is not a published document. It is the working set the business owns.

In 2025 the Commission issued a Recommendation establishing a voluntary reporting standard for SMEs. [K] A voluntary standard is useful as a reference structure for what a data pack might contain, which is a different thing from an obligation to report under it.

What belongs in the pack

The content should follow the questions actually asked. Across most requests four categories recur: energy, water, waste and activity data.

Energy is typically the most requested and the most available, since it is invoiced. The useful form is consumption by site and by period, with the fuel or energy carrier identified, so that it can be converted consistently later.

Water is often requested alongside energy, particularly for water-intensive processes. Where a site both draws and discharges water, both figures are needed, and the difference between them is not automatically consumption — it depends on process losses and on what happens on site.

Waste is requested in categories, and the categories differ between requesting parties. Holding waste data at a level of detail that allows resorting, rather than in pre-aggregated form, avoids re-cutting the same data repeatedly.

Activity data is the denominator that makes the rest meaningful. It might be production tonnage, units, floor area or revenue. Without a consistent activity measure, intensity figures cannot be produced, and intensity is what most requests actually want.

Minimum viable data pack structure
Data streamWhat to holdOwner
EnergyConsumption by site, period and carrierOperations
WaterAbstraction, discharge and process lossesOperations
WasteTonnes by category and route, detail preservedOperations
ActivityProduction output or other denominatorProduction
EvidenceInvoice, meter, waste transfer note referencesData owner
EstimatesMethod, reason and date for each estimated valueData owner
ReviewWhen each dataset was last checked and by whomNamed reviewer

This structure is our own working model for organising an internal data pack. It is not the Commission's voluntary standard and does not reproduce it; readers wanting to follow the standard should work from the Recommendation itself.

Owners, evidence and the estimation log

A data pack decays without owners. Each data stream needs a named individual accountable for its accuracy and for flagging changes — a new meter, a closed line, a different waste contractor. Where ownership is shared, it is usually absent.

Evidence references make the pack auditable. Recording which invoice, meter reading or waste transfer note a figure came from turns a number into a defensible one, and makes verification a matter of checking rather than re-deriving.

The estimation log is the element most often omitted, and the one that most improves quality. Where a figure is estimated rather than measured, recording the method, the reason and the date allows the business to distinguish measured data from estimates later — and to prioritise replacing the estimates that matter most. An unlogged estimate becomes indistinguishable from a measurement the moment it is copied into a customer response.

What changed in 2026, and why it matters here

The European reporting landscape changed materially in 2026. The Council gave final approval on 24 February 2026 to simplification of sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements, with the headline scope reported as companies exceeding both 1,000 employees and €450 million in net annual turnover. [L] A full assessment requires reading the legal text, the applicable entity circumstances and national transposition rather than the headline alone.

For an SME, the practical implication is not that nothing is required. It is that thresholds and scope described in earlier material should not be repeated as current. Where a customer's request cites a threshold, the appropriate response is to note the change and to check the current position rather than to rely on a figure from a previous cycle.

This is also why the data pack is worth building regardless of the legal position. Most requests an SME receives come from customers and banks exercising their own requirements, not from a regulator. The pack answers those whether or not the SME itself is in scope of anything.

Limitations

  • This article describes an internal data management approach. It does not state legal obligations or thresholds, and it is not legal advice.
  • The Commission Recommendation cited is voluntary. Whether any obligation applies to a specific business depends on its circumstances and on current law, including national transposition.
  • The 2026 reporting changes were summarised from a Council press release. The full legal position requires reading the enacted text and assessing entity-specific circumstances.

The next decision

Decide who owns each data stream, and start the estimation log — before answering the next customer questionnaire.

Discuss your project

Taking this into your own project?

Our scoping guide and worksheet walk through the questions that make a brief usable — the decision, the evidence, the options including doing nothing, and what still has to be established. No email required.

Sources

External sources are referenced above by letter. Our own recommendations are identified as such in the text and are not attributed to these sources.

  1. [K]Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710 of 30 July 2025 on voluntary sustainability reporting for SMEshttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32025H1710
  2. [L]Council of the EU — Final approval of simplification of sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements (24 February 2026)https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/02/24/council-signs-off-simplification-of-sustainability-reporting-and-due-diligence-requirements-to-boost-eu-competitiveness/